Political Polarisation

Political polarisation – whether affective, ideological, elite-driven, or digitally amplified – can undermine key pillars of democratic governance: information processing, institutional trust, and accountability. These challenges are especially acute in low- and middle-income countries, where institutions and media ecosystems tend to be more vulnerable and political cleavages more likely to overlap with entrenched social, ethnic, or religious divisions.

Still, the emerging empirical literature offers cause for cautious optimism. A range of experimental and quasi-experimental studies across diverse contexts demonstrates that polarisation is not inevitable. Carefully designed interventions – from elite messaging to media reforms to psychological nudges – can reduce hostility, improve reasoning, and reshape how citizens engage with political information.

For policymakers and practitioners, five cross-cutting lessons stand out.

First, polarisation must be treated as a central consideration for any intervention, not just those directly aimed at reducing it. In polarised contexts, even seemingly neutral reforms – such as budget allocations or infrastructure projects – can be filtered through partisan or identity-based lenses. This can lead to resistance, misinterpretation, or disengagement, regardless of a policy’s technical merit. Effective intervention design must therefore anticipate potential backlash and proactively incorporate strategies for trust-building, inclusive framing, and credibility. Public reception hinges not only on a policy’s substance, but also on how it is communicated: who delivers the message, how it is framed, and the emotional and social signals it conveys.

Second, trust is a necessary precondition. Many interventions – especially those involving corrective information or cross-cutting exposure – depend on citizens perceiving the source as credible. Without baseline trust in media, elites, or institutions, efforts to bridge divides may entrench them instead.

Third, both elites and citizens matter. Even in contexts where elite behaviour sets the tone of polarisation, citizen responses determine whether those cues are amplified or resisted. Structural reforms targeting elite incentives – e.g. changes to primary systems, campaign rules, or electoral institutions – can reduce polarisation over time. But these must be paired with citizen-facing strategies like civic education, media literacy, and interpersonal contact to reshape norms from the bottom up.

Fourth, interventions work best when targeted to specific mechanisms. Affective polarisation often responds to social contact and psychological nudges. Ideological polarisation may require incentive-based or institutional levers. Interventions that address the relevant mechanisms in a given context are more likely to succeed.

Fifth, long-term resilience demands more than short-term fixes. While behavioural nudges or media tweaks can yield measurable gains, durable depolarisation will require investment in independent media, inclusive institutions, and vibrant civil societies. Short-term interventions should be designed to complement and reinforce these longer-term goals.

Finally, a critical research frontier is contextual diversity. Most causal evidence still comes from the US or other high-income democracies, limiting relevance for settings where the risks of polarisation may be most severe. This is not just a gap in geographic coverage, but in conceptual relevance: interventions developed in the Global North may not translate directly into settings with different political, social, and institutional constraints. Encouragingly, a small but growing body of work – from India to the Philippines to a number of countries in sub-Saharan Africa – is beginning to fill this gap. Continued investment in context-sensitive research, especially from the Global South, is essential.

Polarisation is not just a challenge of ideology or partisanship – it is a barrier to effective governance that requires institutional, informational, and social responses. Responding to it requires a diverse toolkit that reflects the diversity of political systems, media environments, and social cleavages around the world. The most promising interventions are adaptive, context-aware, and grounded in local realities. Strengthening governance in polarised environments will require political will, sustained learning, and a commitment to designing in polarised contexts, not despite them.

References

Adida, C, J Gottlieb, E Kramon, and G McClendon (2020), “When does information influence voters? The joint importance of salience and coordination,” Comparative Political Studies, 53(6): 851–891.

Ahler, D J, and G Sood (2018), “The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences,” The Journal of Politics, 80(3): 964–981.

Ajzenman, N, B Ferman, and P C Sant’Anna (2023), “Rooting for the same team: On the interplay between political and social identities in the formation of social ties,” Unpublished manuscript.

Akbiyik, A, J Bowles, H Larreguy, and S Liu (2025), “Polarization and exposure to counter-attitudinal media in an electoral autocracy,” Unpublished manuscript.

Allcott, H, L Braghieri, S Eichmeyer, and M Gentzkow (2020), “The welfare effects of social media,” American Economic Review, 110(3): 629–676.

Allcott, H, M Gentzkow, W Mason, A Wilkins, P Barberá, T Brown, J C Cisneros, A Crespo-Tenorio, D Dimmery, D Freelon, S González-Bailón, A M Guess, Y M Kim, D Lazer, N Malhotra, D Moehler, S Nair-Desai, H Nait El Barj, B Nyhan, A C Paixao de Queiroz, J Pan, J Settle, E Thorson, R Tromble, C Velasco Rivera, B Wittenbrink, M Wojcieszak, S Zahedian, A Franco, C K de Jonge, N J Stroud, and J A Tucker (2024), “The effects of Facebook and Instagram on the 2020 election: A deactivation experiment,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(21): e2321584121.

Alonso, R, and G Padró i Miquel (2025), “Competitive capture of public opinion,” Econometrica, 93(4): 1265–1297.

Arias, E, H Larreguy, J Marshall, and P Querubín (2022), “Priors rule: When do malfeasance revelations help or hurt incumbent parties?” Journal of the European Economic Association, 20(4): 1433–1477.

Azzimonti, M (2018), “Partisan conflict and private investment,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 93: 114–131.

Bäck, H, R Carroll, and E Renström (2023), “Elite communication and affective polarization among voters,” Electoral Studies, 84: 102639.

Bail, C A, L P Argyle, T W Brown, J P Bumpus, H Chen, M B Fallin Hunzaker, J Lee, M Mann, F Merhout, and A Volfovsky (2018), “Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37): 9216–9221.

Baker, S R, A Baksy, N Bloom, S J Davis, and J A Rodden (2020), “Elections, political polarization, and economic uncertainty,” Unpublished manuscript.

Baker, S R, N Bloom, B Canes-Wrone, S J Davis, and J Rodden (2014), “Why has US policy uncertainty risen since 1960?” American Economic Review, 104(5): 56–60.

Baldassarri, D, and A Gelman (2008), “Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion,” American Journal of Sociology, 114(2): 408–446.

Baron, J (2019), “Actively open-minded thinking in politics,” Cognition, 188: 8–18.

Baysan, C (2022), “Persistent polarizing effects of persuasion: Experimental evidence from Turkey,” American Economic Review, 112(11): 3528–3546.

Bénabou, R, and J Tirole (2016), “Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3): 141–164.

Bischof, D, and M Wagner (2019), “Do voters polarize when radical parties enter parliament?” American Journal of Political Science, 63(4): 888–904.

Bolsen, T, and J N Druckman (2015), “Counteracting the politicization of science,” Journal of Communication, 65(5): 745–769.

Boxell, L, M Gentzkow, and J M Shapiro (2017), “Greater internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40): 10612–10617.

Brader, T (2006), Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work, University of Chicago Press.

Brady, W J, J A Wills, J T Jost, J A Tucker, and J J Van Bavel (2017), “Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28): 7313–7318.

Braghieri, L, P Schwardman, and E Tripodi (2024), “Talking across the aisle,” Unpublished manuscript.

Braghieri, L, S Eichmeyer, R Levy, M M Möbius, J Steinhardt, and R Zhong (2025), “Article-level slant and polarization of news consumption on social media,” Unpublished manuscript.

Broockman, D, and J Kalla (2022), “Consuming cross-cutting media causes learning and moderates attitudes: A field experiment with Fox News viewers,” The Journal of Politics, 87(1): 246–261.

Brown, J R, and R D Enos (2021), “The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters,” Nature Human Behaviour, 5: 998–1008.

Callander, S, and J C Carbajal (2022), “Cause and effect in political polarization: A dynamic analysis,” Journal of Political Economy, 130(4): 1097–1141.

Campante, F, R Durante, and F Sobbrio (2017), “Politics 2.0: The multifaceted effect of broadband internet on political participation,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(4): 1094–1136.

Canen, N, C Kendall, and F Trebbi (2020), “Unbundling polarization,” Econometrica, 88(3): 1197–1233.

Casey, K (2015), “Crossing party lines: The effects of information on redistributive politics,” American Economic Review, 105(8): 2410–2448.

Chandrasekhar, A G, H Larreguy, and J P Xandri (2020), “Testing models of social learning on networks: Evidence from two experiments,” Econometrica, 88(1): 1–32.

Cheng, I-H, and A Hsiaw (2022), “Distrust in experts and the origins of disagreement,” Journal of Economic Theory, 200: 105401.

Chopra, F, I Haaland, and C Roth (2024), “The demand for news: Accuracy concerns versus belief confirmation motives,” The Economic Journal, 134(661): 1806–1834.

Cinelli, M, G De Francisci Morales, A Galeazzi, W Quattrociocchi, and M Starnini (2021), “The echo chamber effect on social media,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9): e2023301118.

Coibion, O, Y Gorodnichenko, and M Weber (2020), “Political polarization and expected economic outcomes,” Unpublished manuscript.

Combs, A, G Tierney, B Guay, F Merhout, C A Bail, D S Hillygus, and A Volfovsky (2023), “Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform,” Nature Human Behaviour, 7: 1–8.

Conroy-Krutz, J, and D C Moehler (2015), “Moderation from bias: A field experiment on partisan media in a new democracy,” The Journal of Politics, 77(2): 575–587.

Coppedge, M, J Gerring, C H Knutsen, S I Lindberg, J Teorell, D Altman, F Angiolillo, M Bernhard, C Borella, A Cornell, M S Fish, L Fox, L Gastaldi, H Gjerløw, A Glynn, A G God, S Grahn, A Hicken, K Kinzelbach, J Krusell, K L Marquardt, K McMann, V Mechkova, J Medzihorsky, N Natsika, A Neundorf, P Paxton, D Pemstein, J Pernes, O Rydén, J von Römer, B Seim, R Sigman, S-E Skaaning, J Staton, A Sundström, E Tzelgov, Y-t Wang, T Wig, S Wilson, and D Ziblatt (2024), “V-Dem Dataset v14,” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.

Cruz, C, J Labonne, and F Trebbi (2024), “Campaigning against populism: Emotions and information in real election campaigns,” Unpublished manuscript.

Davis, B, J Goodliffe, and K Hawkins (2025), “The two-way effects of populism on affective polarization,” Comparative Political Studies, 58(1): 122–154.

De Sio, L, and T Weber (2014), “Issue yield: A model of party strategy in multidimensional space,” American Political Science Review, 108(4): 870–885.

Draca, M, and C Schwarz (2024), “How polarised are citizens? Measuring ideology from the ground up,” The Economic Journal, 134(661): 1950–1984.

Druckman, J N, S Klar, Y Krupnikov, M Levendusky, and J B Ryan (2022), “(Mis)estimating affective polarization,” The Journal of Politics, 84(2): 1106–1117.

Druckman, J N, S Kang, J Chu, M N Stagnaro, J G Voelkel, J S Mernyk, S L Pink, C Redekopp, D G Rand, and R Willer (2023), “Correcting misperceptions of out-partisans decreases American legislators’ support for undemocratic practices,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(23): e2301836120.

Enikolopov, R, M Petrova, G Russo, and D Yanagizawa-Drott (2024), “Socializing alone: How online homophily has undermined social cohesion in the US,” Unpublished manuscript.

Enke, B, and F Zimmermann (2017), “Correlation neglect in belief formation,” The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1): 313–332.

Enríquez, J R, H Larreguy, J Marshall, and A Simpser (2025), “Accountability under polarization,” Unpublished manuscript.

Enríquez, J R, H Larreguy, J Marshall, and A Simpser (2024), “Mass political information on social media: Facebook ads, electorate saturation, and electoral accountability in Mexico,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(4): 1678–1722.

Esteban, J, and D Ray (2011), “Linking conflict to inequality and polarization,” American Economic Review, 101(4): 1345–1374.

Esteban, J, M Morelli, and D Rohner (2015), “Strategic mass killings,” Journal of Political Economy, 123(5): 1080–1123.

Ferraz, C, and F Finan (2008), “Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2): 703–745.

Fishkin, J, A Siu, L Diamond, and N Bradburn (2021), “Is deliberation an antidote to extreme partisan polarization? Reflections on ‘America in One Room’,” American Political Science Review, 115(4): 1464–1481.

Fouka, V, and M Tabellini (2022), “Changing in-group boundaries: The effect of immigration on race relations in the United States,” American Political Science Review, 116(3): 968–984.

Fouka, V, S Mazumder, and M Tabellini (2021), “From immigrants to Americans: Race and assimilation during the Great Migration,” The Review of Economic Studies, 89(2): 811–842.

Galasso, V, M Morelli, T Nannicini, and P Stanig (2024), “The populist dynamic: Experimental evidence on the effects of countering populism,” Unpublished manuscript.

Gentzkow, M, and J M Shapiro (2006), “Media bias and reputation,” Journal of Political Economy, 114(2): 280–316.

Gentzkow, M, and J M Shapiro (2011), “Ideological segregation online and offline,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4): 1799–1839.

Gentzkow, M, and J M Shapiro (2010), “What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers,” Econometrica, 78(1): 35–71.

Gentzkow, M, J M Shapiro, and M Taddy (2019), “Measuring group differences in high-dimensional choices: Method and application to congressional speech,” Econometrica, 87(4): 1307–1340.

Gentzkow, M, M B Wong, and A T Zhang (2025), “Ideological bias and trust in information sources,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 17(2): 162–213.

Gethin, A, C Martínez-Toledano, and T Piketty (2021), “Brahmin left versus merchant right: Changing political cleavages in 21 Western democracies, 1948–2020,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1): 1–48.

Ghosh, A, P Kundu, M Lowe, and G Nellis (2025), “Creating cohesive communities: A youth camp experiment in India,” The Review of Economic Studies, rdaf026.

Ginn, W, and J Saadaoui (2025), “Divided we fall: The hidden costs of political polarization on macroeconomic performance,” Unpublished manuscript.

González-Bailón, S, D Lazer, P Barberá, M Zhang, H Allcott, T Brown, A Crespo-Tenorio, D Freelon, M Gentzkow, A M Guess, S Iyengar, Y M Kim, N Malhotra, D Moehler, B Nyhan, J Pan, C Velasco Rivera, J Settle, E Thorson, R Tromble, A Wilkins, M Wojcieszak, C K de Jonge, A Franco, W Mason, N J Stroud, and J A Tucker (2023), “Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook,” Science, 381(6656): 392–398.

Graham, M H, and M W Svolik (2020), “Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States,” American Political Science Review, 114(2): 392–409.

Grechyna, D (2021), “Mandatory spending, political polarization, and macroeconomic volatility,” European Journal of Political Economy, 68: 101990.

Greene, K, E Rossiter, E Seira, and A Simpser (2024), “Interacting as equals: How contact can promote tolerance among opposing partisans,” Nature Human Behaviour, 9: 147–155.

Groenendyk, E, and Y Krupnikov (2021), “What motivates reasoning? A theory of goal-dependent political evaluation,” American Journal of Political Science, 65(1): 180–196.

Grose, C R (2020), “Reducing legislative polarization: Top-two and open primaries are associated with more moderate legislators,” Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 1(2): 267–287.

Guess, A M, M Lerner, B Lyons, J M Montgomery, B Nyhan, J Reifler, and N Sircar (2020), “A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27): 15536–15545.

Guess, A M, N Malhotra, J Pan, P Barberá, H Allcott, T Brown, A Crespo-Tenorio, D Dimmery, D Freelon, M Gentzkow, S González-Bailón, E Kennedy, Y M Kim, D Lazer, D Moehler, B Nyhan, C Velasco Rivera, J Settle, D R Thomas, E Thorson, R Tromble, A Wilkins, M Wojcieszak, B Xiong, C K de Jonge, A Franco, W Mason, N J Stroud, and J A Tucker (2023a), “How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?” Science, 381(6656): 398–404.

Guess, A M, N Malhotra, J Pan, P Barberá, H Allcott, T Brown, A Crespo-Tenorio, D Dimmery, D Freelon, M Gentzkow, S González-Bailón, E Kennedy, Y M Kim, D Lazer, D Moehler, B Nyhan, C Velasco Rivera, J Settle, D R Thomas, E Thorson, R Tromble, A Wilkins, M Wojcieszak, B Xiong, C K de Jonge, A Franco, W Mason, N J Stroud, and J A Tucker (2023b), “Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions,” Science, 381(6656): 404–408.

Guriev, S, and E Papaioannou (2022), “The political economy of populism,” Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3): 753–832.

Guriev, S, N Melnikov, and E Zhuravskaya (2021), “3G internet and confidence in government,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4): 2533–2613.

Haggard, S (2021), Backsliding: Democratic regress in the contemporary world, Cambridge University Press.

Halberstam, Y, and B Knight (2016), “Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter,” Journal of Public Economics, 143: 73–88.

Hartman, R, W Blakey, J Womick, C Bail, E J Finkel, H Han, J Sarrouf, J Schroeder, P Sheeran, J J Van Bavel, R Willer, and K Gray (2022), “Interventions to reduce partisan animosity,” Nature Human Behaviour, 6(9): 1194–1205.

Hobolt, S B, K Lawall, and J Tilley (2024), “The polarizing effect of partisan echo chambers,” American Political Science Review, 118(3): 1464–1479.

Huber, J D, and P Suryanarayan (2016), “Ethnic inequality and the ethnification of political parties: Evidence from India,” World Politics, 68(1): 149–188.

Iyengar, S, Y Lelkes, M Levendusky, N Malhotra, and S J Westwood (2019), “The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States,” Annual Review of Political Science, 22: 129–146.

Kempf, E, and M Tsoutsoura (2024), “Political polarization and finance,” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 16: 413–434.

Larreguy, H, and E Tiburcio (2025), “Political polarization and counter-attitudinal information consumption and internalization,” Unpublished manuscript.

Larreguy, H, and P J Raffler (2025), “Accountability in developing democracies: The impact of the internet, social media, and polarization,” Annual Review of Political Science, 28: 413–434.

Lazer, D M J, M A Baum, Y Benkler, A J Berinsky, K M Greenhill, F Menczer, M J Metzger, B Nyhan, G Pennycook, D Rothschild, et al. (2018), “The science of fake news,” Science, 359(6380): 1094–1096.

Lee, A H-Y (2022), “Social trust in polarized times: How perceptions of political polarization affect Americans’ trust in each other,” Political Behavior, 44(3): 1533–1554.

Lees, J, and M Cikara (2019), “Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts,” Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3): 279–286.

Lelkes, Y, G Sood, and S Iyengar (2017), “The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect,” American Journal of Political Science, 61(1): 5–20.

Levendusky, M S (2018), “Americans, not partisans: Can priming American national identity reduce affective polarization?” The Journal of Politics, 80(1): 59–70.

Levendusky, M S, and D A Stecula (2023), We need to talk: How cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization, Cambridge University Press.

Levy, G, and R Razin (2019), “Echo chambers and their effects on economic and political outcomes,” Annual Review of Economics, 11: 303–328.

Levy, R (2021), “Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment,” American Economic Review, 111(3): 831–870.

Lowe, M (2021), “Types of contact: A field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration,” American Economic Review, 111(6): 1807–1844.

Manacorda, M, G Tabellini, and A Tesei (2022), “Mobile internet and the rise of communitarian politics,” Unpublished manuscript.

Mason, L (2018), Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity, University of Chicago Press.

McCarty, N, K T Poole, and H Rosenthal (2016), Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches, MIT Press.

Melnikov, N (2024), “Mobile internet and political polarization,” Unpublished manuscript.

Moore-Berg, S L, L-O Ankori-Karlinsky, B Hameiri, and E Bruneau (2020), “Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26): 14864–14872.

Mosleh, M, C Martel, D Eckles, and D G Rand (2021), “Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7): e2022761118.

Mullainathan, S, and A Shleifer (2005), “The market for news,” American Economic Review, 95(4): 1031–1053.

Nyhan, B, J Settle, E Thorson, M Wojcieszak, P Barberá, A Y Chen, H Allcott, T Brown, A Crespo-Tenorio, D Dimmery, D Freelon, M Gentzkow, S González-Bailón, A M Guess, E Kennedy, Y M Kim, D Lazer, N Malhotra, D Moehler, J Pan, D R Thomas, R Tromble, C Velasco Rivera, A Wilkins, B Xiong, C K de Jonge, A Franco, W Mason, N J Stroud, and J A Tucker (2023), “Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing,” Nature, 620(7972): 137–144.

Orhan, Y E (2022), “The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding: Comparative evidence,” Democratization, 29(4): 714–735.

Peskowitz, Z, and J Szewczyk (2022), “The polarization dynamics of electoral reforms,” Political Science Research and Methods, 10(1): 116–135.

Peterson, E, and A Kagalwala (2021), “When unfamiliarity breeds contempt: How partisan selective exposure sustains oppositional media hostility,” American Political Science Review, 115(2): 585–598.

Poole, K T, and H Rosenthal (1985), “A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis,” American Journal of Political Science, 29(2): 357–384.

Posner, D N (2004), “The political salience of cultural difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are allies in Zambia and adversaries in Malawi,” American Political Science Review, 98(4): 529–545.

Prior, M (2013), “Media and political polarization,” Annual Review of Political Science, 16: 101–127.

Rabin, M, and J L Schrag (1999), “First impressions matter: A model of confirmatory bias,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1): 37–82.

Rathje, S, J J Van Bavel, and S van der Linden (2021), “Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26): e2024292118.

Reiljan, A, D Garzia, F F Da Silva, and A H Trechsel (2024), “Patterns of affective polarization toward parties and leaders across the democratic world,” American Political Science Review, 118(2): 654–670.

Riera, P, and A G Madariaga (2023), “Overlapping polarization: On the contextual determinants of the interplay between ideological and affective polarization,” Electoral Studies, 84: 102628.

Ruggeri, K, B Večkalov, L Bojanić, T L Andersen, S Ashcroft-Jones, N Ayacaxli, P Barea-Arroyo, M L Berge, L D Bjørndal, A Bursalıoğlu, V Bühler, M Čadek, M Çetinçelik, G Clay, A Cortijos-Bernabeu, K Damnjanović, T M Dugué, M Esberg, C Esteban-Serna, E N Felder, M Friedemann, D I Frontera-Villanueva, P Gale, E Garcia-Garzon, S J Geiger, L George, A Girardello, A Gracheva, A Gracheva, M Guillory, M Hecht, K Herte, B Hubená, W Ingalls, L Jakob, M Janssens, H Jarke, O Kácha, K N Kalinova, R Karakasheva, P R Khorrami, Ž Lep, S Lins, I S Lofthus, S Mamede, S Mareva, M F Mascarenhas, L McGill, S Morales-Izquierdo, B Moltrecht, T S Mueller, M Musetti, J Nelsson, T Otto, A F Paul, I Pavlović, M B Petrović, D Popović, G M Prinz, J Razum, I Sakelariev, V Samuels, I Sanguino, N Say, J Schuck, I Soysal, A L Todsen, M R Tünte, M Vdovic, J Vintr, M Vovko, M A Vranka, L Wagner, L Wilkins, M Willems, E Wisdom, A Yosifova, S Zeng, M A Ahmed, T Dwarkanath, M Cikara, J Lees, and T Folke (2021), “The general fault in our fault lines,” Nature Human Behaviour, 5(10): 1369–1380.

Skytte, R (2021), “Dimensions of elite partisan polarization: Disentangling the effects of incivility and issue polarization,” British Journal of Political Science, 51(4): 1457–1475.

Stewart, A J, N McCarty, and J J Bryson (2020), “Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline,” Science Advances, 6(50): eabd4201.

Sunstein, C R (2017), #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media, Princeton University Press.

Taber, C S, and M Lodge (2006), “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs,” American Journal of Political Science, 50(3): 755–769.

Ventura, T, R Majumdar, J Nagler, and J A Tucker (2023), “Misinformation beyond traditional feeds: Evidence from a WhatsApp deactivation experiment in Brazil,” Unpublished manuscript.

Voelkel, J G, M N Stagnaro, J Y Chu, S L Pink, J S Mernyk, C L Redekopp, I Ghezae, M Cashman, D Adjodah, L G Allen, L V Allis, G Baleria, N Ballantyne, J Lees, G Lenz, M Levendusky, R Littman, K Luo, A Lyles, B Lyons, W Marsh, J Martherus, L A Maurer, C Mehl, J Minson, M Moore, S L Moore-Berg, M H Pasek, A Pentland, C Puryear, H Rahnama, S Rathje, J Rosato, M Saar-Tsechansky, L A Santos, C M Seifert, A Shariff, O Simonsson, S Spitz Siddiqi, D F Stone, P Strand, M Tomz, D S Yeager, E Yoeli, J Zaki, J N Druckman, D G Rand, and R Willer (2024), “Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity,” Science, 386(6719): eadh4764.

Vosoughi, S, D Roy, and S Aral (2018), “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, 359(6380): 1146–1151.

Weiss, C M, D P Green, and R Willer (2025), “Can politicians bridge partisan divides? A field experiment with the US National Governors Association,” Unpublished manuscript.

Widmann, T (2021), “How emotional are populists really? Factors explaining emotional appeals in the communication of political parties,” Political Psychology, 42(1): 163–181.